<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Praetorian Prefect &#187; Remote Exploit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/tag/remote-exploit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://praetorianprefect.com</link>
	<description>Information security, a little slower...a little deeper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:46:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>IEPeers &#8211; A New Internet Explorer Zero Day Vulnerability</title>
		<link>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/03/iepeers-a-new-internet-explorer-zero-day-vulnerability/</link>
		<comments>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/03/iepeers-a-new-internet-explorer-zero-day-vulnerability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Prefect</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Remote Exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aurora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drive by download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praetorianprefect.com/?p=3511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We posted an aside yesterday referencing <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/msrc/archive/2010/03/09/security-advisory-981374-released.aspx">Microsoft's recent blog post</a> for <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/981374.mspx">new security advisory 981374</a> referencing a new zero day vulnerability in Internet Explorer versions 6 and 7. New details have emerged since, and the exploit has moved from being what was described as part of "limited targeted attacks" to being widely accessible and <a href="http://www.rec-sec.com/exploits/msf/ie_iepeers_pointer.rb">available as a new module for the Metasploit framework</a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/03/iepeers-a-new-internet-explorer-zero-day-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>February&#8217;s Patch Tuesday</title>
		<link>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/02/februarys-patch-tuesday/</link>
		<comments>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/02/februarys-patch-tuesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MJP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patch Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ActiveX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patch tuesday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Exploit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praetorianprefect.com/?p=3305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today is patch Tuesday for February 2010, and it marks a fairly busy patch cycle for Microsoft, who released thirteen updates today. In late January, there was an out-of-band release for two critical patches, in response to the high profile issue around the Internet Explorer Aurora exploit. This makes a total of fifteen total patches between since January's patch Tuesday.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/02/februarys-patch-tuesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;Aurora&#8221; IE Exploit Used Against Google in Action</title>
		<link>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/01/the-aurora-ie-exploit-in-action/</link>
		<comments>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/01/the-aurora-ie-exploit-in-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 00:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Prefect</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metasploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-wide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praetorianprefect.com/?p=3065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9144844/Hackers_used_IE_zero_day_not_PDF_in_China_Google_attacks?source=toc">big news</a> hit earlier this week, the attack vector that allowed bad actors presumably from China into the networks of Google, Juniper, Adobe, and some 30 other firms was an Internet Explorer zero day, a use after free vulnerability on an invalid pointer reference affecting IE 6, 7, and 8 but only used in IE 6 according to Microsoft.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/01/the-aurora-ie-exploit-in-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 SMB Kernel Crash Video</title>
		<link>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/01/windows-smb-crash-video/</link>
		<comments>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/01/windows-smb-crash-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Prefect</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Remote Exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praetorianprefect.com/?p=2997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back <a href="http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2009/11/how-to-crash-windows-7-and-server-2008/">on November 11th, 2009</a> we confirmed <a href="http://g-laurent.blogspot.com/2009/11/windows-7-server-2008r2-remote-kernel.html">Laurent Gaffié's remote exploit</a> for Windows that causes a kernel crash. The operating system actually freezes creating a denial of service when for example a user is tricked into clicking on a link to a malicious SMB share on a web page. The SMB client goes into an infinite loop when processing this malformed request according to Microsoft. The video below demonstrates this effect, having a user click a web site link and showing the crash.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/01/windows-smb-crash-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JUNOS (Juniper) Kernel Crash Video</title>
		<link>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/01/junos-juniper-kernel-crash-video/</link>
		<comments>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/01/junos-juniper-kernel-crash-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 01:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Prefect</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Remote Exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juniper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[router]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praetorianprefect.com/?p=2863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have noted some interesting responses since <a href="http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/01/junos-juniper-flaw-exposes-core-routers-to-kernal-crash/">our post yesterday</a> detailing the information in Juniper bulletin PSN-2010-01-623 and our thoughts on its somewhat understated effect. Since our post yesterday, the bulletin has been updated, becoming more specific about the versions affected (basically excluding JUNOS version 10.x and versions no longer supported by Juniper). We have tested all 256 permutations of the Options field in the TCP header, and reproduced the kernel crash, which is demonstrated in the video below.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/01/junos-juniper-kernel-crash-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JUNOS (Juniper) Flaw Exposes Core Routers to Kernel Crash</title>
		<link>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/01/junos-juniper-flaw-exposes-core-routers-to-kernal-crash/</link>
		<comments>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/01/junos-juniper-flaw-exposes-core-routers-to-kernal-crash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Prefect</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core routers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juniper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tcp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praetorianprefect.com/?p=2812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A report has been received from Juniper at 4:25pm under bulletin PSN-2010-01-623 that a crafted malformed TCP field option in the TCP header of a packet will cause the JUNOS kernel to core (crash).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/01/junos-juniper-flaw-exposes-core-routers-to-kernal-crash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remote SMB Exploit: Crashing Windows 7 and Server 2008</title>
		<link>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2009/11/how-to-crash-windows-7-and-server-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2009/11/how-to-crash-windows-7-and-server-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MJP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Remote Exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2009/11/how-to-crash-windows-7-and-server-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Python code was posted today by Laurent Gaffie on <a href="http://g-laurent.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">his blog</a>, demonstrating a much too easy way to remotely crash a Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 machine. The crash is caused by sending a NetBIOS header which specifies that the SMB packet is 4 bytes smaller or larger than it actually is. In this code sample below, you can see that the header has the length of the packet set to 9a rather than 9e (4 bytes smaller).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2009/11/how-to-crash-windows-7-and-server-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

