<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IEPeers &#8211; A New Internet Explorer Zero Day Vulnerability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/03/iepeers-a-new-internet-explorer-zero-day-vulnerability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/03/iepeers-a-new-internet-explorer-zero-day-vulnerability/</link>
	<description>Information security, a little slower...a little deeper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:33:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet And Computer Security</title>
		<link>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/03/iepeers-a-new-internet-explorer-zero-day-vulnerability/comment-page-1/#comment-12165</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet And Computer Security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 05:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praetorianprefect.com/?p=3511#comment-12165</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes right this article is good information&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes right this article is good information</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: priligy</title>
		<link>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/03/iepeers-a-new-internet-explorer-zero-day-vulnerability/comment-page-1/#comment-11102</link>
		<dc:creator>priligy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praetorianprefect.com/?p=3511#comment-11102</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, thanks for this information.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, thanks for this information.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 98 Guy</title>
		<link>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/03/iepeers-a-new-internet-explorer-zero-day-vulnerability/comment-page-1/#comment-8624</link>
		<dc:creator>98 Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 01:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praetorianprefect.com/?p=3511#comment-8624</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Regarding Windows 98, we have no idea, it is not a platform we test
  on for blog articles as Microsoft ended support back in July of 2006.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why is it a necessary condition that Microsoft continue support of win-98 as a proviso for testing exploits?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Are you aware that all IE6 rollup patches and fixes that microsoft has released for win-2k are functional on win-98?  Even if Microsoft officially says they no longer support win-98, most of the patches that Microsoft releases for win-2K function just fine on win-98.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is a continuous debate among those that still run win-98 (and there are many) regarding the functionality and vulnerability of win-98 to current malware and exploits.  It would be nice if someone actually could test these exploits against win-98 and settle these arguments.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>Regarding Windows 98, we have no idea, it is not a platform we test
  on for blog articles as Microsoft ended support back in July of 2006.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Why is it a necessary condition that Microsoft continue support of win-98 as a proviso for testing exploits?</p>

<p>Are you aware that all IE6 rollup patches and fixes that microsoft has released for win-2k are functional on win-98?  Even if Microsoft officially says they no longer support win-98, most of the patches that Microsoft releases for win-2K function just fine on win-98.</p>

<p>There is a continuous debate among those that still run win-98 (and there are many) regarding the functionality and vulnerability of win-98 to current malware and exploits.  It would be nice if someone actually could test these exploits against win-98 and settle these arguments.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/03/iepeers-a-new-internet-explorer-zero-day-vulnerability/comment-page-1/#comment-8615</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 13:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praetorianprefect.com/?p=3511#comment-8615</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Fascinating stuff! The Romans would be amazed at how efficient their Praetorians are 2000 years past! :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating stuff! The Romans would be amazed at how efficient their Praetorians are 2000 years past! :-)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prefect</title>
		<link>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/03/iepeers-a-new-internet-explorer-zero-day-vulnerability/comment-page-1/#comment-8366</link>
		<dc:creator>Prefect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praetorianprefect.com/?p=3511#comment-8366</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The code above cuts out portions and translates some of the Base64 encoding for demonstration, its not provided to be operational.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For testing you&#039;re much better going with the Metasploit module for which a link is provided above and where you can control the payload.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regarding Windows 98, we have no idea, it is not a platform we test on for blog articles as Microsoft ended support back in July of 2006.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The code above cuts out portions and translates some of the Base64 encoding for demonstration, its not provided to be operational.</p>

<p>For testing you&#8217;re much better going with the Metasploit module for which a link is provided above and where you can control the payload.</p>

<p>Regarding Windows 98, we have no idea, it is not a platform we test on for blog articles as Microsoft ended support back in July of 2006.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 98 Guy</title>
		<link>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/03/iepeers-a-new-internet-explorer-zero-day-vulnerability/comment-page-1/#comment-8040</link>
		<dc:creator>98 Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praetorianprefect.com/?p=3511#comment-8040</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Does this exploit function properly on a win-98 system with IE6-SP1?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve taken the example code on this page and saved it to an .htm file and tried to have FireFox and IE6 open it.  Firefox does nothing, and IE6 complains that it can&#039;t open some file.  Is this what the code is supposed to do?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this exploit function properly on a win-98 system with IE6-SP1?</p>

<p>I&#8217;ve taken the example code on this page and saved it to an .htm file and tried to have FireFox and IE6 open it.  Firefox does nothing, and IE6 complains that it can&#8217;t open some file.  Is this what the code is supposed to do?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Team-NoG &#124; A New Internet Explorer Zero Day Vulnerability</title>
		<link>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/03/iepeers-a-new-internet-explorer-zero-day-vulnerability/comment-page-1/#comment-7952</link>
		<dc:creator>Team-NoG &#124; A New Internet Explorer Zero Day Vulnerability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praetorianprefect.com/?p=3511#comment-7952</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Praetorianprefect has written about it, the article also contains the code for the exploit, happy reading.   Filed under: Cyber-Security Tags: 0day, fail, Internet Explorer, Microsoft, zero day, zeroday [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Praetorianprefect has written about it, the article also contains the code for the exploit, happy reading.   Filed under: Cyber-Security Tags: 0day, fail, Internet Explorer, Microsoft, zero day, zeroday [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IEPeers – A New Internet Explorer Zero Day Vulnerability &#124; Enhanced Computer Network Defence</title>
		<link>http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/03/iepeers-a-new-internet-explorer-zero-day-vulnerability/comment-page-1/#comment-7897</link>
		<dc:creator>IEPeers – A New Internet Explorer Zero Day Vulnerability &#124; Enhanced Computer Network Defence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praetorianprefect.com/?p=3511#comment-7897</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] more here: IEPeers – A New Internet Explorer Zero Day Vulnerability   Posted in Security News  Tags: aurora, internet, internet explorer, metasploit, microsoft, [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more here: IEPeers – A New Internet Explorer Zero Day Vulnerability   Posted in Security News  Tags: aurora, internet, internet explorer, metasploit, microsoft, [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

